John 8:2-11 At dawn he appeared again in the temple courts, where all the people gathered around him, and he sat down to teach them. The teachers of the Law and the Pharisees brought in a woman caught in adultery. They made her stand before the group and said to Jesus, "Teacher, this woman was caught in the act of adultery. In the law Moses commanded us to stone such women. Now what do you say?" They were trying to use the question as a trap, in order to have a basis for accusing him.
But Jesus bent down and started to write on the ground with his finger. When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, "Let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her." Again he stooped down and wrote on the ground.
At this, those who heard began to go away one at a time, the older ones first, until only Jesus was left, with the woman still standing there. Jesus straightened up and asked her, "Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?"
"No one, sir," she said.
"Then neither do I condemn you," Jesus declared. "Go now and leave your life of sin."
I am always a bit uncomfortable about these verses. Not because they say anything controversial, or are not easy to understand. But, because, in this arena, I am guilty very often of heaving stones like an automatic weapon, without considering my own sins.
I am not worthy to judge anyone, about much of anything. That does not mean that I don't. In reality, we have to make judgements nearly continuously in this life. We have to judge if some lifestyle or behavior is in our best interest, which always involves some judgement around morality. We have to judge whether something is safe for ourselves or for our family. We have to judge whether a work situation is bearable or not.
We have to make those judgements, because we are ultimately responsible for our actions. One of my favorite lines in a book is from Lonesome Dove. When the two main characters, Gus and Call, are about to hang their old friend and fellow Texas Ranger, Jake, for crossing the line that defined Gus and Call's life. Jake says, "I didn't see no line, I was just trying to cross the territory."
It was a pitiful excuse, but it was one of the most artfully crafted interactions, rich with meaning and subtext, that defined the book for me. Clearly, there was a line, a clear and vivid line that both Gus and Call saw easily. To the rest of the world, that line was blurrier, especially in the wash of years since Gus and Call had drawn the line. Even their contemporaries did not see it clearly any longer.
Jake was the weakest member of that old band, but also, the common man. Even a good man, in his day, could end up across that line. It moved constantly, and involved decisions that are made daily.
Jesus understood this. Nothing is said about the woman's actual guilt. We assume that she was guilty, being caught in the act. It is a much more powerful metaphor if she is actually guilty. Jesus knew her guilt or innocence. And, all he said was that he would not condemn her either. We all need to go and leave our life of sin. The point is pretty powerful, and runs through the Bible over and over.
God is the judge of guilt or innocence, because no one else knows or sees enough to judge fairly and faultlessly. We, you and I, do not possess the abilities to see or understand clearly enough to judge morality and causation. We are placing greater and greater trust in our understanding of mentality and the workings of the mind. But, that, in and of itself is a sham. It is simply a comparison chart to data previously assembled, that was not complete on any person in the data set.
We don't know all of it. We know enough that the FBI can do their thing like on Criminal Minds. Pretty spooky how right they get it. But, they also get it dead wrong occasionally. And, I want us to all recognize the occasional. We are, all of us, occasionally dead wrong. Sometimes literally, sadly.
We cannot see into hearts and minds. We cannot know the intricate chain that winds behind each person and results in the person they are today. We have to make up our minds to approach that limitation one way or the other. We can accept that limitation and assume the best and brightest about everyone. Or we can accept that limitation, and assume the worst about everyone and everything.
As an engineer, I am conditioned to assume the worst. The worst case scenario, the worst case design basis, the worst case preexisting flaw, the worst case environment, the worst case fatigue, the worst of the worst has to be the assumption for engineering, because the point is to create something that will withstand and perform, even in the worst case scenario. As an engineer, I also know, clearly, that nothing in this universe we have knowledge and description of, can withstand the combination of all of the worst case conditions.
That is the art in engineering. Discovering that point at which failure is possible, and then figuring out how do you ensure you never see that point. I said art, and I meant it. Because once that failure point is known, engineering develops human interactions to ensure we never get there.
That means every single thing created on this planet, is capable of failing, and has to be tended by humans, to make certain that we do not allow the system to reach that failure point. That means every system humans create will fail, because we will screw it up. This isn't a science lesson, just an illustration that nothing is outside of this passage about Jesus' and his remarkable humanity and divinity.
We do not know the background of anyone well enough to judge what they will do next. Period. We cannot know that someone will not make the right choice tomorrow and build on that right choice and create a wonderful existence, just because their pattern of decision at every other point documented was wrong. People do it every day. They stop abusing substances. They stop abusing themselves or others. They stop being unethical in business. They stop condemning themselves for their past. And they rise above.
This post is about Charlotte, NC; and the bigger issues surrounding that situation. And the knife cuts both ways.
You cannot assume that a man/woman, because of their criminal past, because of their predispositions, because of their sin, will continue to sin. God is calling them every second of every day, and it is possible that they heed that call. That is the essence of grace that Jesus offers. No matter your sin, no matter your past, no matter whatever, Jesus wants to, will and always shall, forgive you. That is the message of the Bible, to a struggling world. The reality is not this that we live in, but a much better, much greater existence that we were created for.
So, every interaction that occurs between police and the public, should be conducted with this in mind. No one is guilty today because of their yesterday. Our Constitution is predicated on that principle, our entire judicial system is predicated on that principle. It is the requirement of the state, of the government, to prove guilt. Because we are assumed innocent.
It does not always work that way. In fact, it absolutely never works that way. It is our highest ideal, but we know that every system we put in place will fail. Humans will get it wrong. Humans will forget or mess up the protections put in place to prevent the system from reaching that failure point, and the system will experience that worst case scenario and fail. We get it wrong.
It happens, it is, there is zero explanation to deny it. We aren't God, we are just created in His image. It is not enough, we make mistakes. I suppose that is the point, under all the hoopla, of Black Lives Matter. Regardless of their yesterday's or appearance, each person's worth in the moment has to be assumed to be infinite, because we cannot judge correctly. All of us have to be valued equally, because none of us can know enough to discount any of our worth.
I sympathize and I truly understand that it happens, it is maybe even prevalent. I do not deny that I am myself, very guilty of the same thing. I am human, I fail. We cannot assume because someone is black, wearing dreads and pants sagged down to their knees, that they are in any way less righteous than we are. We cannot assume that because they have been found guilty in the past, that that means they are guilty today. Their appearance can't be trusted, any more than their history, because just as much as any person can fail, they also have the God given gift to succeed, wildly, beyond our imaginations.
When a man or woman of color is killed in a confrontation with police, rock throwing starts immediately. No one, at this point today, stops and considers their own issues and failures. No one, at this point today, stops and considers that innocence is not only possible, but is present in one side or the other of the event.
Because it is not about Black Lives Matter, or Blue Lives Matter. The truth is all lives matter, and I am not saying that to discount the BLM movement. But, the human condition insures that our perception is flawed. We do not have the ability to know fully, and both sides are plausible. That kid with the BB gun was doing nothing wrong just playing, and the officer that shot him saw just a gun, pointed toward his partner, and fired. I am not saying that is what happened in Cleveland, but, both of those scenarios can be true at the same time.
We have created this situation for ourselves. We have entrenched poverty and violence in certain places in our society, and by allowing that to continue, we are partly responsible for the social norm that we believe about the "Hood" or "ghetto". It is even true in the homeland of Jesus. We believe the narrative that those are just hateful people that have been killing each other since God created man, literally, and they are incapable of anything else.
Just because a story, or reputation has history as proof, does not mean that today, that is what is occurring. I will even use 9/11 as an example. In the tens of thousands of people that survived the Trade Centers, I will guarantee you that some convicted felon, with a rap sheet as long as your arm, helped someone they did not know, to get away from that horror. I will also guarantee that some person, who has no convictions for us to consider, took stuff from that chaos, that did not belong to them. It just is true.
We can't assume that any of these tragic shootings of people of color was because they are guilty, and that we knew that first, because they are people of color. That is what BLM is saying, or trying to say sometimes. What we struggle with is the logic argument that we all see, and can't articulate. If it is true that Michael Brown can't be assumed to be a bad guy, just because he was big and black, if that is true, and it is; then it cannot be assumed that the cop was wrong that shot him, because he was white.
That is why this problem never seems to be healed. We cannot see clearly enough to know. Even our standard of proof is not complete. It is just beyond a reasonable doubt. It is just that we believe enough of our human interventions occurred correctly and as designed, that it is most probable that the evidence points to the truth. We get it right a far greater percentage of the time, when finding someone guilty, than we do at getting it right in believing they are innocent. Meaning, while we do have people wrongly convicted, we have many more people that actually committed the crime that go free, than we do those that were innocent and convicted.
But, when the frustration and urging of the mob gets loudest, we fail to our basest instincts. We riot. We demand a murderer be set free, instead of a savior. There is no difference in the mob that is wrecking parts of Charlotte, than there is in the one that demanded Pilate free Barrabas. Well, there is one, we don't have the spectacle of washing our hands of the innocent blood. It would work no more for us, than it did for Pilate. But, otherwise, there is not a single difference in the mobs.
That is because, every system fails, and our worst case scenario is the mob. There will always be those that follow unrest for profit. Either as instigators and baiters, or as looters and thieves.
Because of the instigators, we cannot wait for the evidence to be reviewed, and the preponderance to show what we can prove beyond a reasonable doubt. If it is a black man shot by police, than it has to be because he was black. It is a faulty argument from a logic standpoint.
However, if you hear they shot my daddy and all he was doing was reading a book, and you are black, and you have seen and heard what the communities of color have seen and heard, it takes very little evidence to get convinced beyond a reasonable doubt, that the cop shot him because he was black.
It doesn't matter that the cop was black too. I have heard it and read it, "They are the worst kind of cop." Nothing about that statement is born out in fact, though it could be possible. Again, when we allow our perception to be all that we judge by, we make wrong judgements. In this case, either the cop was very, very wrong; or; a big chunk of the city of Charlotte is smoldering because a cop shot a man pointing a gun at others. It comes down to either of those being true. And, we can't know within 2 hours. That is the issue that BLM cannot overcome. Regardless of how right or wrong they are, they are taking permanent and irrevocable action on faulty data, they don't know enough. They didn't in Ferguson, and they don't in Charlotte.
But, that does not make them guilty, for the same logic. We don't know the pressures, the experience and the fear that motivates those protesting. I feel for the protesters, and I agree with them. What I can't get behind, and will not support, is a group that destroys and harms and steals. Almost no one of good conscience will. BLM has a very tough job. They have to continue to make the discussion about predisposition and profiling, while at the same time condemning the actions that occur that they don't condone. But, if they do that, they take away from the discussion about the problem they are protesting.
And, honestly, there is no leadership to guide that. I don't mean BLM is leaderless, but they have cloud leadership. It has always been a problem for them, and I say them, because though I agree with the premise, I do not agree with the rhetoric or the tactics. They cannot unify and standardize a message. They have those in leadership roles, in various places, that are so angry and so fed up, that they do advocate violence and destruction. Again, I am not judging their experience, I don't have it. But, I am judging their rhetoric and their voice, and I find it wrong.
I find the other rhetoric and voice equally wrong. I strongly disagree with the 49er quarterback. I dislike his tactics to the point of offense. But, he does not deserve death threats. He should not be endangered for PEACEFULLY and LEGALLY, protesting a failure he perceives. It is just as wrong as judging BLM by the actions of the mob. It is just as poisonous.
Jesus could settle this. I can't. What I pray is that we will look at Jesus' words, and emulate them. All of us, when we get to the point we have to act on assumption, assume innocence. I don't want to see officers shot, and do not condemn their right to protect themselves, and more importantly, their responsibility to protect others. But, I do believe that our actions are predicated on guilt, in some communities. Regardless of the track record and the history, that is not what Jesus asked of us, nor is it what America was founded on.
We should be assuming innocence, because we know our own guilt. Were I to be pulled over tomorrow, I do not want the cop to treat me based on my actions at 16 or 17. That was over 30 years ago, and I am not that person today. When we all realize that, and assume that about others, the dialogue gets calmer. The argument becomes a discussion. And, maybe, just maybe, we make progress.
Progress, not solution. I think we all need to understand that last part of the passage. "Go now and leave your life of sin." We are not going to solve it/fix it in one sitting, one discussion. But we will, if we leave our life of sin, the sin of assumption and false judgement. There is so much that we can do for each other, instead of to each other. That is what I pray we start doing, finding what we can do FOR each other. That is the starting point, and it feels a long way away.
GLYASDI